Global Warming ... errr... uhhh Climate Change

This article is not about the recent snowfalls on the Eastern part of the US. Rather, it is about Dr. Phil Jones, of East Anglia University in the UK, who has just admitted that the Medieval Warming Period (MWP) was warmer than "man-made" Global Warming, errr... uhhh Climate Change, today.

That's right, the earth so warmed in the Northern Hemisphere from 800 - 1300AD that the Vikings name Greenland -- GREEN-land, and actually grew crops there, something that is impossible today.

Dr. Jones also admitted, according to the UK's newspaper, The Daily Mail, Feb. 14, 2010, that the earth has not warmed since 1995.

"Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon. And he said that for the past 15 years, there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming., ." Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html#ixzz0fYilhmkZ

Man-made Global Warming is far from "settled science." So far, the US Government is relying upon UN Studies based upon Dr. Jones and his cronies studies, particularly the 2007 Report which won a Nobel Peace Prize, but is suffering when its details are challenged. And then there is the Al Gore film, which won an Academy Award and Mr. Gore was likewise awarded a Nobel Peace Prize; his film, "An Inconvenient Truth" has affected public attitudes and was required viewing in some school districts, and yet has been challenged from many quarters.

Why should we take the word of a discredited UN Report and a film maker (Al Gore) who has a financial interest in making Global Warming a fact? Thank God that same film maker also invented the Internet so that average people like you and me can challenge the elite's opinions.

Dear Reader, why should we take Al Gore's opinion as fact? Why should we take a United Nations Report as being worth anything? Wouldn't it be a wise move by the Obama Administration to establish a neutral, independent Climate Change Commission made up of Americans to separate fact from fiction before taking any US Taxpayer action? I vote "Yes."

"According to a U.S. Senate and Public Works Committee report, the “alarm about the future of polar bear decline is based on speculative computer model predictions many decades in the future. Those predictions are being 'challenged by scientists and forecasting experts,' said the report.
Those challenges are supported by facts on the ground, including observations from Inuit hunters in the region."